|
1980- . :
,
1950- 1960- . ,
. ,
F-104O "" - F-4F ""2, - F-4K/M
"", - F-104S G-91. ,
, ,
F-16.
, , , -
,
, . ,
, , , ,
,
-
.
. ,
-106,
"", .
= 1,8, 10 ,
400 . -106
"", ,
. , -106, 1981 .
,
.
, -106.
TKF, "",
""
. "" ND102,
().
-. 1983 .
, . "",
F-404.
.
: ,
, , ,
, ,
- , .
1981 . (), () ()
,
,
. , 1982 .,
"" - ,
(Agile Combat Aircraft - ). ,
1989 .
"". , ,
= 2, ,
.
,
"" ( ,
- RB199 8800 , 1,2).
1983 .
: 16 , , ,
,
FEFA (Future European Fighter Aircraft -
-). EFA.
- .
DASA (), (), (), - ()
AS ().
-
.
,
,
1.
EFA 1984 .
1986 .
"" , .
.
"" ,
.
,
, 30%
35%.
,
.
EFA
. ,
1960-80- .,
. .
EFA ,
, "".
.
DASS (Defense Aids Sub System),
-
, .
,
, ,
, .
, ,
, , "", F-15, F-16
F/A-18.
EFA -
.
, ,
, .
1985 .
"". -
: - 33%
( 250 ), - 21% (200 )
- 13% (100 ).
. , -
. , - . .
EFA
.
1986 . ,
-, MTU, .
EJ200.
1980- . EFA
: , , .
,
, .
EFA ;
F-16 F/A-18,
.
EFA -
" " (Experimental Aircraft Program),
1983 . . 1986
. EFA, "",
, .
.
.
,
.
: 76%, - 7% - 17%.
1988 .
EFA
, ,
, 53*. ,
, ,
, .
.
,
, .
.
.
,
. ,
-29
, ,
EFA. - ,
. ,
,
F-15, F-16 F/A-18.
EFA. 1992 .
- EFA. "
,
",
- 2000 . - 2002 .
2000 2035 . - EF2000.
, , ,
-, -
-.
,
-. , ,
, " ,
,
".
.
,
12-30%. ,
.
, - .
: ,
,
, . ,
,
.
607 : 250 , 140 , 130
87 .
:
, -
, CASA, .
- 7-10 .
27 1994 . DASA
, ,
N 1 EF2000, DA1.
, DA2, . N 3 7
, N 4 - - -
. .
N 5 ,
ECR 90, a N 6 - . N 3
.
1995 .,
1994 . 1995 .
EJ200 (
- RB199). 4500
, 4000 .
800 , ,
- . ,
, (),
, , .
, 111.
850 . . .
,
. EFA/EF2000 .
, ,
, , "
". ,
, EF2000.
, EF2000 ,
( DASS ),
-29, ,
.
EF2000,
""
36 .
EF2000
30-33 20%. ,
, 30%
.
- ( EF2000
). ,
, , ,
, .
EF2000 2002 .
-29,
- F-4F, "
" AN/APG-65, MIL STD
1553, -124, ,
AIM-120 AMRAAM (
2 . ).
AMRAAM ,
F-4F . " -
"
"". ,
. -29
. ,
:
-
F-4F ,
70 "" ,
;
-
( 36
), EF2000
;
-
EF2000 ( 2006
.), 140 100.
-29
( " "),
EF2000 1,8 .
12 . .
,
.
-29 60 . .
1997 . 12 . 1994 .
100 -29
(80 . ). 20 . .
,
-29,
. -29,
F-1S, F-16, F/A-18 SAAB
JAS-39.
() 5-10
- F-15 F-16. 24
F-15C 265-530 . . (
),
F-16 145-265 . .
F-16C 50 20 .
. .
F-15, F-16 F/A-18. ,
EF2000
-27. ,
, "".
EF2000 ,
( Joust).
,
. -27 -35
( AMRAAM)
. , EF2000
, -27,
XXI ( ,
).
,
, EF2000, ,
"" .
, EF2000
F-22
, F-22 .
, ,
"-94", -35 82%
EF2000 (
, F-22A 91%,
"" - 60%, F-15E - 50%, F/A-18E - 35%, -29 - 32% F-16C - 21%).
, EF2000
-29, ,
-29 EF2000,
.
<1 EF2000 "", -35 F-16C
(, , ),
-29, F/A-18E F-15E.
>1 EF2000,
( ) "", F-16C, -35, -29, F-15E F/A-18E.
, F-16C, "", -35, F-15E, -29 F/A-18E.
, ,
EF2000 ,
(
DASS, ),
-29. , ,
, .
. ,
, . ,
EF2000 ,
, . ,
, EF2000 -29
,
. , EF2000
1,02, -29
- 1,12 - 1,26 (, ,
).
EF2000 300 /, -29 - 310 /,
2,0 2,3,
-29 . -35 (,
, )
- ,
.
, -35
.
,
EF2000 ,
F-22A
, EF2000 .
- ,
, ,
.
, ,
EF2000 ,
. , ,
- ,
,
.
. , EF2000
,
, .
,
EF2000 ,
, ,
, EF2000.
,
. ,
, "
". ,
,
-,
.
.
"-1" -
2003 . 2004 EF-2000 ""
. 148
EF-2000 "" "-1".
EF-2000 . 2015 ""
148, 236 236 . ( 620 EF-2000 "")
- (232 - , 180 - , 121 -
87 - ). 2002
18
"-2" 1,95 (2,55 ). 2007
""
18 15 . "-2"
"-1". 72 ,
EF-2000 "" 707
6 . "-2"
- 14 2004 .
16 2008 . "",
60 "-2".
NETMA
, .
.
"-2" "-1"
, , ,
"-". "-3"
- NETMA. ,
236 "-3" 2008 - 2009 .
"-3" 2013
. , "" "-3" ,
, ,
, .
EF2000.
""
,
. 40% , 20% -
- "" (Al-Li 8090), 18% - , 12% -
10% - . 70%
, 12%, - 15%,
- 3%. ,
9999 .
- , "".
6000 .
, ,
,
.
53 , 2,2.
( )
( ),
. (
, - )
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
, 2,40 2.
, .
, - .
.
,
, , 500 , 700 .
.
EF2000 - RB199-122
(2 7260 ), "".
EJ200 (2
9200 ).
EJ200 -
. ,
, ,
.
.
. 900
.
,
(
), .
, .
:
1000 () 1500 .
.
,
30% , . 1 10
.- ( : F/A-18
27,5 .-). EF2000
45 . 1000
400 ( F/A-18 - 1012 ).
()
, .
,
( ),
.
- ECR90 PIRATE.
ECR90 -,
GEC-, , FIAR
INISEJL ,
.
" ",
" " FRS.2.
, ,
- .
,
.
,
,
.
PIRATE , 1992 .
(Eurofirst) FIAR (), -1
() ().
.
.
,
, ,
, - ,
. , .
9 6
.
EF2000
, -, ,
,
,
.
(Total Terrain Avionics)
.
DASS -
, , -
,
, ,
( , )
.
(
, , ).
13 .
- AIM-120 AMRAAM, "" (
) "" ( ),
, AIM-9
"" ASRAAM .
- 10,
18 140 (40000 ).
. 27- .
6500
, - .
1000 , -
325 - -
1000 . -
3 15 .
.
-
().
. .
,
.
- 16
, .
- 18
. ,
.
,
.
, F-16, F-22 -35, EF2000
,
GEC . -29 EF2000
" ",
( , ,
, , ).
,
.
GEC ,
. -
, ,
, ASRAAM.
.
, ,
. ,
.
.
,
. ,
.
. , ,
.
2.8 Patch 8 -2.8.8- | Arcgis Pro
For organizations and individuals who could not immediately upgrade to (which was built on .NET 6 and therefore unaffected), this represented a significant operational roadblock. The solution was to provide a patch for the affected versions.
This article explores everything you need to know about the 2.8.8 update, including key fixes, installation procedures, and why staying current with patches is vital for your spatial data integrity. 🛠️ Key Fixes and Improvements in 2.8.8 arcgis pro 2.8 patch 8 -2.8.8-
Keeps your software patched against known vulnerabilities. Important Considerations and Lifecycle Notice For organizations and individuals who could not immediately
However, given its current unsupported status, this patch should be viewed as a . While it effectively resolved the issues of its era, the long-term best practice for any GIS operation is to migrate forward. The decision to remain on 2.8.8 should be a temporary measure, backed by a clear plan to eventually move to a supported, modern release of ArcGIS Pro. 🛠️ Key Fixes and Improvements in 2
ArcGIS Pro 2.8 Engine Core │ ├── Data Engineering Environment (Advanced Data Profiling & Skewness) │ ├── UI & Usability (Command Search Bars & Dynamic Clipboard Captures) │ └── I/O Optimization (Accelerated Project I/O & Parallelized Geoprocessing) 1. Data Engineering Workspace
: This patch includes all fixes from previous 2.8.x patches (1 through 7).
Updates within the patch enhanced the stability of tools handling mobile geodatabases.
. 2008
 |